Closer to Home: Why Globalism and State Multiculturalism Have Failed, and What Should Replace Them
For a generation, Western leaders sold us two big ideas. The first was globalism: that more and more of the decisions shaping our lives, about trade, law, borders and budgets, should move upward, away from elected national and state governments and toward supranational bodies, international courts and a sprawling network of unelected organizations. The second was multiculturalism as state policy: that governments should manage citizens as separate identity groups, each encouraged to keep apart, rather than ask everyone to share a common civic life.
By Stuart M. Williams





